T20, a Doomsday Machine or..

If you were frozen in early 70s and thawed today, you won’t be blamed for being surprised at not recognizing the game of cricket. Night cricket, coloured clothing, bright lights, skimpily dressed cheers leaders, loud music and an almost universal par run rate of 6-8 runs per over, would certainly confuse you as to the identity of this vaguely familiar beast. And if you were unfortunate enough to see or follow “Player Auction” you would have required medical attention! Historians and anthropologists tell us that evolution is an extremely slow process. Hence I consider cricket fans of my generation, extremely lucky. We can claim to have seen evolution of a game that hardly changed for over a century, from its “Lagaan” days.

No one, including the protagonists knew that Kerry Packer’s fight with the Australian cricket board to get Australian TV broadcast rights would turn out to be lot more than merely a clash of egos. When the push came to the shove, Packer’s so-called circus ended up being the evolutionary impetus that the game needed. What World Series cricket started was reluctantly accepted by the so-called bastions of the game almost like a bitter pill, simply because the audience could not be denied the super mix of serious cricket with entertainment. History repeated itself when T20, once again with its roots in English domestic cricket was picked up by BCCI almost reluctantly and converted into a global product. If some one had told me a decade back that a yet unproven test bowler like Kemar Roach will earn close to a million US in a country where many of its finest cricketers earned just enough to keep their heads above water, I would have politely guided him to the bus no. 111. (Destination Mental Hospital in Ahmedabad). Trust English to invent something and let others to actually show its true worth!! Traditionalists rarely benefit from serendipity…


Being a lover of traditional cricket, I must confess I was almost a non-believer in this hit and giggle. Having played in a few 20-over-a-side flood lit tennis ball cricket tournaments in India, even though as a summer past-time, I did understand the power of this format to attract a large section of audience who otherwise found traditional cricket far too slow and even boring. However I did not anticipate my excitement and sleepless nights due to IPL 3; not that I am complaining! It is a spectacle not to be missed for those who love the game of cricket. I love Test cricket over anything, but my cricket-fix can be satiated to some extent with a T20 within a short span; especially as there are not many test matches being played. As we say in Gujarati, “Na mama karta kano mamo saro” (verbal translation; better one-eyed uncle than none!!). I may have started my attraction to this format with a bit of scepticism, but as old Shammi Kapoor song goes, “Aap yoon hi agar hamse milte rahe, dekhiye ek din pyar ho jayega!” (Keep meeting like this and one day you will fall for me), I have met T20 sufficient number of times.

Its immense popularity in India though purely accidental, also represents a successful marriage between business and entertainment. At one point, BCCI refused to acknowledge its presence and even refused to put up a team for inaugural world cup, by not starting a domestic comp; the only cricket board in the world to do so. They did not expect Indian team’s out-of-no-where win in the inaugural event. That was enough to ignite the cricket-mad India, mainly since it included two special wins over arch rivals Pakistan. Kapil’s Devils did exactly the same in 1983 for the 50 overs format. Who will forget that bizarre bowl out in the first T20 world cup fixture between India and Pakistan? After the game ended in a tie, the hilarious and now redundant bowl-out tie-breaker rule was applied, when no Pakistani bowler could hit the defenceless stumps, where as Indian net-bowlers did so with aplomb. That must rank as one of the funniest thing I have ever seen on the cricket field….it was as if even the stumps were mocking Pakistan bowlers who balked and could not deliver a straight one. Why take long run-up and deliver a leg spinner or a leg cutter when the purpose is to hit the stumps with no batsman in front? I am sure Afridi and Umar Gul will have nightmares of that event long after they retire. Is there any surprise why Indians are more successful in all facets of life than their erstwhile brothers? The final was another cracker that will go down in the annals on Indian history as a golden page. Pakistan played brilliant cricket but Indians were just that bit better and a tad lucky!! You have to be, especially when you need hands of someone like Appam to bring the curtain down on the last act!

T20 is very much like watching a movie where the whole life of a character is condensed. It showcases all the elements of cricket within a short period, matching short attention span of many viewers. Normally oldies like me like to reserve that opinion for younger generation, but really, lack of patience has nothing to do with the age. Honestly I can’t understand why older folks would not enjoy shorter version more; after all the time left for them on this earth, will fit in lot more T20s than test cricket! But then you know that often those who complain, are the ones who “voyeur” it most. Cricket and miniskirts have something in common…

Fear that this format may kill what is traditionally held very close to cricket lovers’ hearts has some validity. All the mastery required to stay at the crease or to “think” out a batsman who has come to the crease with a liberal dose of “Favicol” or “Liquid Nails”, in a game of unlimited overs, is not required in the shorter version. Believe it or not, but God does not give THAT mastery even to the so-called gifted. It has to be learned hard way through the toils of innumerable hot days on the paddocks. Uneven, unmade or batsmen-friendly wickets; amateur, unresponsive and often one-eyed umpires; butter fingered team mates; no-clue captains are some elements that teach a wannabe cricketer to get his or her runs or wickets in the most obvious ways. Most importantly, longer version teaches a player, the most important aspect of cricket, or indeed life; that you must learn to control your mind. A player has to go through so many filters before making it to the top that often these obstacles become insurmountable for many. That is why test cricket is the ultimate test of the full range of a player’s ability; not just God given talent but those illusive ingredients called temperament and attitude. Without that many talented players failed to reach the zenith they could have.

Comparatively, to succeed in T20 format, you need to be able to biff more than pat; clear rather than pierce the field, be lucky rather than skillful. It is more physical. A lucky mishit or a French-cut can be the difference between a champ and a chump. Often a morsel of luck could do what a wagon full of skills couldn't. You may say that T20 is more a gamble than a competition. Having said that, even though the psychological component of the longer version of the game manifests differently in T20, the result is the same. Sometimes a player may travel a life time in a space of 20 overs.. .any doubts just ask Misbah-Ul-Haq!! From a cricketer’s point of view, in T20 you are on a hiding to nothing. A bowler may have to bowl only 4 overs in the whole game, but the emotional roller-coaster could demand the energy of a 20 over marathon. Every one will forget your earlier 23 balls if the last one goes awry. Similarly for a batsman, a complete change of mindset will demand a huge mental effort. T20 challenges a player as much psychologically as the longer version; it requires a player to respond in a far shorter time frame. Look at who are the top players in the IPL 3 so far; classical test match players like Kallis, Tendulkar, Kumble and Murli are ahead of T20 specialists. Class and experience can adjust to anything indicating that T20 is not all slam-bang.

So is T20 really a dooms day machine for the game of cricket as many are lamenting? Many doubting Thomases had similarly predicted death of test cricket when T20’s predecessor, the 50 over ODI format became popular. Test cricket is thriving, and if you ask me, the reason is mainly one day cricket. ODI’s popularity has been responsible for evolution of players who have made run scoring as their only goal even in test cricket. A run rate close to 4 runs per over in test cricket is almost expected today; if that happened in seventies, I am sure it would have resulted in a few coronaries. It is almost as if the batsmen have thrown off their mental shackles. That is the most important reason for more results in the test matches even in days of batting friendly conditions and laws. Due to ODIs, the most significant improvement has been in fielding. From seventies fielding sides, where many fielders used to “escort” the ball to the fence, to the nineties sides with many fielders who would routinely dive or slide to stop even a single, is a quantum leap mainly as a result of the exposure of the players at very young age to the ODIs. Using same corollary, I believe T20 will bring some unseen, unexpected bonuses to the traditional cricket. Equipment is one area that looks very fertile for improvement. A few cricket boards are already trialling coloured cricket balls to promote night test cricket; Mongoose long-handle bat has already made its debut in IPL 3. I am sure we will see new strategies invented to counter the ever changing scenario on the cricket field. Since the days of Kerry Packer, everything that has been thrown in the path of this great game has actually empowered rather than stymie it. Cricket is a dynamic entity; almost like the sub-continent culture which has absorbed everything that has attacked it in last 5000 years but has continuously evolved to progress. Perhaps that is why it is so popular on the sub-continent; perhaps sub-continent culture needs cricket as much as cricket needs it.